Siddhartha
said: "You know, my friend, that even as a young man, when we
lived with the ascetics in the forest, I came to distrust doctrines
and teachers and to turn my back on them. I am still of the same turn
of mind, although I have, since that time, had many teachers. A
beautiful courtesan was my teacher for a long time, and a rich
merchant and a dice player. On one occasion, one of the Buddha's
wandering monks was my teacher. He halted in his pilgrimage to sit
beside me when I fell asleep in the forest. I also learned from him
and I am grateful to him, very grateful. But most of all, I have
learned from this river and from my predecessor, Vasudeva. He was a
simple man; he was not a thinker, but he realized the essential as
well as Gotama. He was a holy man, a saint."
Govinda said: "It seems to me, Siddhartha, that you still like to jest a little. I believe you and know that you have not followed any teacher, but have you not yourself, if not a doctrine, certain thoughts? Have you not discovered certain knowledge yourself that has helped you to live? It would give me great pleasure if you would tell me something about this."
Siddhartha said: "Yes, I have had thoughts and knowledge here and there. Sometimes, for an hour or for a day, I have become aware of knowledge, just as one feels life in one's heart. I have had many thoughts, but it would be difficult for me to tell you about them. But this is one thought that has impressed me, Govinda. Wisdom is not communicable. The wisdom which a wise man tries to communicate always sounds foolish."
"Are you jesting?" asked Govinda.
"No, I am telling you what I have discovered. Knowledge can be communicated, but not wisdom. One can find it, live it, be fortified by it, do wonders through it, but one cannot communicate and teach it. I suspected this when I was still a youth and it was this that drove me away from teachers.
There is one thought I have have, Govinda, which you will again think is a jest or folly: that is, in every truth the opposite is equally true. For example, a truth can only be expressed and enveloped in words if it is one-sided. Everything that is thought and expressed in words is one-sided, only half the truth; it all lacks totality, completeness, unity.
When
the illustrious Buddha taught about the world, he had to divide it
into Samsara and Nirvana, into illusion and truth, into suffering and
salvation. One cannot do otherwise, there is no other method for
those who teach. But the world itself, being in and around us, is
never one-sided. Never is a man or a deed wholly Samsara or wholly
Nirvana; never is a man wholly a saint or a sinner. This only seems
to be so because we suffer the illusion that time is something real.
Time is not real, Govinda. I have realized this repeatedly. And if
time is not real, then the dividing line that seems to lie between
this world and eternity, between suffering and bliss, between good
and evil, is also an illusion."
"How is that?" asked Govinda, puzzled.
"Listen, my friend! I am a sinner and you are a sinner, but someday the sinner will be Brahma again, will someday attain Nirvana, will someday become a Buddha. Now this 'someday' is an illusion; it is only a comparison. The sinner is not on the way to a Buddha-like state; he is not evolving, although our thinking cannot conceive things otherwise. No, the potential Buddha already exists in the sinner; his future is already there. The potential hidden Buddha must be recognized in him, in you, in everybody.
The
world, Govinda, is not imperfect or slowly evolving along a path to
perfection. No, it is perfect at every moment; every sin already
carries grace within it, all small children are potential old men,
all sucklings have death within them, all dying people―eternal
life. It is not possible for one person to see how far another is on
the way; the Buddha exists in the robber and the dice player; the
robber exists in the Brahmin.
During
deep meditation it is possible to dispel time, to see simultaneously
all the past, present and future, and then everything is good,
everything is perfect, everything is Brahman. Therefore, it seems to
me that everything that exists is good―death as well as life; sin
as well as holiness, wisdom as well as folly. Everything is
necessary, everything needs only my agreement, my assent, my loving
understanding; then all is well with me and nothing can harm me.
I
learned through my body and soul that it was necessary for me to sin,
that I needed lust, that I had to strive for property and experience
nausea and the depths of despair in order to learn not to resist
them, in order to learn to love the world, and no longer compare it
with some kind of desired imaginary world, some imaginary vision of
perfection, but to leave it as it is, to love it and be glad to
belong to it. These, Govinda, are some of the thoughts that are in my
mind."
Siddhartha bent down, lifted a stone from the ground and held it in his hand.
"This." he said, handling it, "is a stone, and within a certain length of time it will perhaps be soil and from the soil it will become plant, animal or man. Previously I should have said: This stone is just a stone; it has no value, it belongs to the world of Maya, but perhaps because within the cycle of change it can also become man and spirit, it is also of importance. That is what I should have thought.
Siddhartha bent down, lifted a stone from the ground and held it in his hand.
"This." he said, handling it, "is a stone, and within a certain length of time it will perhaps be soil and from the soil it will become plant, animal or man. Previously I should have said: This stone is just a stone; it has no value, it belongs to the world of Maya, but perhaps because within the cycle of change it can also become man and spirit, it is also of importance. That is what I should have thought.
But
now I think: This stone is a stone; it is also animal, God and
Buddha. I do not respect and love it because it was one thing and
will become something else, but because it has already long been
everything and always is everything. I love it just because it is a
stone, because today and now it appears to me a stone. I see value
and meaning in each one of its fine markings and cavities, in the
yellow, in the gray, in the hardness and the sound of it when I knock
it, in the dryness or dampness of its surface. There are stones that
feel like oil or soap, that look like leaves or sand, and each one is
different and worships Om in its own way; each one is Brahman. At the
same time it is very much stone, oily or soapy, and that is just what
pleases me and seems wonderful and worthy of worship.
But I will say no more about it. Words do not express thoughts very well. They always become a little distorted, a little foolish. And yet it also pleases me and seems right that what is of value and wisdom to one man seems nonsense to another."
Govinda had listened in silence.
But I will say no more about it. Words do not express thoughts very well. They always become a little distorted, a little foolish. And yet it also pleases me and seems right that what is of value and wisdom to one man seems nonsense to another."
Govinda had listened in silence.
"Why
did you tell me about the stone?" he asked hesitatingly
after a pause.
"I did so unintentionally. But perhaps it illustrates that I just love the stone and the river and all these things that we see and from which we can learn. I can love a stone, Gonvinda, and a tree or a piece of bark. These are things and one can love things. But one cannot love words. Therefore teachings are of no use to me; they have no hardness, no softness, nor colors, no corners, no smell, no taste―they have nothing but words. Perhaps that is what prevents you from finding peace, perhaps there are too many words, for even salvation and virtue. Samsara and Nirvana are only words, Govinda. Nirvana is not a thing; there is only the word Nirvana."
Govinda said: "Nirvana is not only a word, my friend; it is a thought."
Siddhartha continued: "It may be a thought, but I must confess, my friend, that I do not differentiate very much between thoughts and words. Quite frankly, I do not attach great importance to thoughts either. I attach more importance to things. For example, there was a man at this ferry who was my predecessor and teacher. He was a holy man who for many years believed only in the river and nothing else. He noticed that the river's voice spoke to him. He learned from it; it educated and taught him. The river seemed like a god to him and for many years he did not know what every wind, every cloud, every bird, every beetle is equally divine and knows and can teach just as well as the esteemed river. But when this holy man went off into the woods, he knew everything; he know more than you and I, without teachers, without books, just because he believed in the river."
Govinda said: "But what you call thing, is it something real, something intrinsic? Is it not only the illusion of Maya, only image and appearance? Your stone, your tree, are they real?"
"This also does not trouble me much," said Siddhartha. "If they are illusion, then I also am illusion, and so they are always of the same nature as myself. It is that which makes them so lovable and venerable. That is why I can love them. And here is a doctrine at which you will laugh. It seems to me, Govinda, that love is the most important thing in the world. It may be important to great thinkers to examine the world, to explain and despise it. But I think it is only important to love the world, not to despise it, not for us to hate each other, but to be able to regard the world and ourselves and all beings with love, admiration and respect."
No comments:
Post a Comment